Suche

German Education Server Eduserver Gebärdensprache DGS-Button Leichte Sprache LS-Button
Erweiterte Suche

Ariadne Pfad:

Inhalt

In how many ways is the approximate number system associated with exact calculation?

h t t p s : / / d o i . o r g / 1 0 . 1 3 7 1 / j o u r n a l . p o n e . 0 1 1 1 1 5 5Externer Link

The approximate number system (ANS) has been consistently found to be associated with math achievement. However, little is known about the interactions between the different instantiations of the ANS and in how many ways they are related to exact calculation. In a cross-sectional design, we investigated the relationship between three measures of ANS acuity (non-symbolic comparison, non-symbolic estimation and non-symbolic addition), their cross-sectional trajectories and specific contributions to exact calculation. Children with mathematical difficulties (MD) and typically achieving (TA) controls attending the first six years of formal schooling participated in the study. The MD group exhibited impairments in multiple instantiations of the ANS compared to their TA peers. The ANS acuity measured by all three tasks positively correlated with age in TA children, while no correlation was found between non-symbolic comparison and age in the MD group. The measures of ANS acuity significantly correlated with each other, reflecting at least in part a common numerosity code. Crucially, we found that non-symbolic estimation partially and non-symbolic addition fully mediated the effects of non-symbolic comparison in exact calculation.(DIPF/Org.).

Schlagwörter

Empirische Untersuchung, Vergleich, Grundschule, Schüler, Leistungsbeurteilung, Schülerleistung, Arithmetik, Grundrechenart, Mathematische Kompetenz, Mathematisches Denken, Rechnen, Zahlbegriff, Zahlensystem, Forschungsstand, Leistungsmessung, Symbol, Brasilien,

Quelle In: PLOS ONE, 9 (2014) 11, Art. e111155, 13 S., URL des Volltextes: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0111155
Sprache englisch
Dokumenttyp Zeitschriftenaufsatz
ISSN 1932-6203
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0111155
Erfasst von DIPF | Leibniz-Institut für Bildungsforschung und Bildungsinformation, Frankfurt am Main
Update 2018/4

Inhalt auf sozialen Plattformen teilen (nur vorhanden, wenn Javascript eingeschaltet ist)

Teile diese Seite: